Fragile State Index 2016
(Fund for Peace)
The FSI focuses on the indicators of risk and is based on thousands of articles and reports that are processed by our CAST Software from electronically available sources.
2016 Global Peace Index
(Institute for Economics and Peace)
The 2016 Global Peace Index shows that the world became less peaceful in the last year. Results also show a growing global inequality in peace, with the most peaceful countries continuing to improve while the least peaceful are falling into greater violence and conflict.
CrisisWatch | Tracking Conflict Worldwide
(International Crisis Group)
“From Trump to Merkel: how the world is divided between fear and openness”
Two major concepts define the political struggle in the west today. One can be termed “globalism”, which is currently most prominently represented by the German chancellor, Angela Merkel. The other is “territorialism”, a view that the very likely Republican candidate for the US elections in November, Donald Trump, represents.
“The War of Western Failures: Hopes for Syria Fall with Aleppo”
The siege of Aleppo is a humanitarian catastrophe on a dramatic scale — and a victory for Russian President Vladimir Putin. He has seized on the Syrian civil war to expose an impotent West and show his own geopolitical muscle.
“These 5 Facts Explain Why Europe Is Ground Zero for Terrorism”
From demography to political demagoguery, Iooking at why Europe has ended up in the crosshairs of ISIS
Crisis Watch: Tracking Conflict Worldwide
International Crisis Group
10 Conflicts to Watch in 2017
Jean-Marie Guéhenno, International Crisis Group
(Originally published in Foreign Policy)
From Turkey to Mexico, the list of the world’s most volatile flashpoints got a lot more unpredictable this year.
“All In Diary”: a unique source of clear, concise and up-to-date guidance on topics across the entire humanitarian field to view online or download.
Presence and Proximity – To Stay and Deliver, Five Years On
Many aid organisations wish to stay and deliver in insecure contexts with great needs, but there are still too few organisations able to manage the risks linked to serve vulnerable communities in the midst of conflict and chaos.
Humanitarians operating in highly volatile environments face a wide range of institutional, operational, access, and security challenges that necessitate carefully designed responses and mitigation measures. These challenges and good practices were analysed and subsequent recommendations provided in a landmark study, entitled To Stay and Deliver: Good Practice for Humanitarians in Complex Security Environments, commissioned by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in 2011.
Five years on, the purpose of the present study is to examine progress in responding to the various issues raised in the original 2011 report. The report shows that humanitarian community continues to grapple with the problem of its ability to stay and deliver effectively and responsibly in highly insecure environments. Progress has been made in a number of areas. Humanitarian leaders consistently talk of their commitment to staying and delivering where at all feasible, and we have seen notable instances where UN agencies, NGOs, and others have stayed and delivered at great risk. Yet despite these improvements, this study also broadly finds that not enough has changed, particularly at the field level, since the publication of To Stay and Deliver in 2011.
Operational Security Management in Violent Environments
(Revised Edition, November 2010)
Since the publication of the first edition of Good Practice Review 8 on Operational Security Management in Violent Environments in 2000, the global security environment has changed significantly. New conflict contexts have created new sources of threat to international humanitarian action. Increasing violence against aid workers and their operations, including more kidnappings and lethal attacks, has had serious implications for humanitarian relief work in insecure contexts. Meanwhile, agencies themselves have become much more conscious of the need to provide for the safety and security of their staff.
To reflect these changes, the Humanitarian Practice Network has published a new version of GPR 8. The new edition both updates the original material and introduces new topics, such as the security dimensions of remote management programming, good practice in interagency security coordination and how to track, share and analyse security information. The new edition also provides a more comprehensive approach to managing critical incidents, in particular kidnapping and hostage-taking, and discusses issues relating to the threat of terrorism.
Improving the Safety of Civilians: A protection training pack
Sophia Swithern & Rachel Hastie (Oxfam GB, 2008)
This training pack is intended to help humanitarian workers to improve the safety of civilians being subjected to violence, coercion, or deliberate deprivation. The pack includes modules on: What is protection? Planning a programme, Mainstreaming protection and Programming for protection. The activity sessions within the modules cover topics as diverse as international standards for civilian protection, objective setting, indicators and monitoring, humanitarian negotiation, co-ordination and alliance building, reducing the risk of sexual violence and advocacy for humanitarian protection. A selection of core exercises at the end of the book is designed to encourage interaction and create debate. The pack outlines all activities, with detailed trainers’ notes, timings, resources needed, and handouts, feedback, and evaluation sheets. Colour cards and posters are included at the back of the book. The materials are designed for use by experienced facilitators, who have some knowledge of protection issues, to train emergency-response teams. Activities can be adapted for participants with different levels of knowledge.
You must be logged in to post a comment.